The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

AI Snake OilVoices

The AI-as-Normal-Technology view of loss-of-control incidents

09.14

This essay is over 13,000 words long and represents our most substantial writing on AI safety since the original essay.

Read at AI Snake Oil ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

The AI-as-Normal-Technology view of loss-of-control incidents

More from AI Snake Oil on Accept All

VoicesAI agents can't yet do open-ended AI research AI Snake Oil

VoicesWhat will be left for us to work on? AI Snake Oil

VoicesUp the Stack: How AI’s Escape From the Commodity Trap Risks Enterprise Lock-in AI Snake Oil

VoicesWhy AI hasn’t replaced software engineers, and won’t AI Snake Oil

VoicesDid Google’s AI agents really build an operating system for $916? AI Snake Oil

VoicesDo AI Risks Require Extraordinary Government Intervention? AI Snake Oil