The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Stack Overflow BlogGitHub

Part 3: Knowing when your agent doesn’t know: the confidence layer

10.07

The most important number an agent produces isn’t its answer — it’s how sure it is. Compose that number from independent signals, check it’s calibrated, grade the high-stakes calls with a second…

Agents & vibe coding

Read at Stack Overflow Blog ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

Part 3: Knowing when your agent doesn’t know: the confidence layer

Related

ResearchAgent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses Microsoft Research

ToolsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on vLLM: 5x Agentic Throughput Since Day 0 vLLM Blog

ToolsRemote control for local agents Cursor Changelog

ResearchOpen and Emergent Problems in Agentic Privacy and Security: A Contextual Angle Google Research

VoicesWhy agent swarms could be the next “scaling law” Understanding AI

SiliconAttempts to Keep Humans in the AI Loop May Actually Push Them Out IEEE Spectrum AI