The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

MIT Technology ReviewValley

How “reverse game theory” could keep AI agents in check

11.03

A new approach known as “reverse game theory” aims to control powerful AI models by designing systems that incentivize them to stick to the rules.

Agents & vibe coding

Read at MIT Technology Review ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

How “reverse game theory” could keep AI agents in check

Related

ValleyRaising the quality of insights in agentic analytics MIT Technology Review

ValleyStop counting tokens, start counting what ships MIT Technology Review

ValleyThe Download: the agentic web arrives and the drive for safer roads MIT Technology Review

ValleyThe agentic web is here MIT Technology Review

ValleyThe Download: AI agent tracking and climate feedback loops MIT Technology Review

Anthropic cracks down on game cloning in Claude Code after wave of AI-built knockoffs The Decoder