The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

Together AITools

GLM-5.3 vs. Claude Fable 5 on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing

08.21

We ran 904 DeepSWE rollouts on GLM-5.3 and Claude Fable 5. A tie on pass@1, but GLM-5.3 wins pass@4 and costs 5.4x less: \$3.99 per rollout vs. \$21.63.

Models & releases

Read at Together AI ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

GLM-5.3 vs. Claude Fable 5 on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing

Related

ToolsGLM-5.3 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing Together AI

ToolsDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Claude Fable 5 on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing Together AI

ToolsDeepSeek-V4 Flash 0731 vs GPT-5.6 Luna on DeepSWE: Cost and Coding Together AI

ToolsOpen-sourcing evals for open-weight agents Cline Blog

ToolsHow we rebuilt the Auggie CLI harness to make tasks 53% cheaper than Claude Code Augment Code

VoicesLabs are struggling to keep frontier models under control Understanding AI