The name is the button.

An agent writes the code now, and a human thumb hovers over Accept all a hundred times a day. The honest question of this decade is what, exactly, you just accepted. So I read the diff.

Eight years as a backend engineer in Stockholm, back in Tokyo since 2023, and I still ship something small most nights, usually badly. My one rule: the only real review of a model is the thing you built with it. That is why there is no leaderboard on this site.

Around a hundred and forty sources come through — the labs' own posts, the papers, the tools, the runtimes and languages nobody is watching yet, the chip under the demo, and the newsletters people actually forward. What is moving gets counted so the week reads at a glance, and every few days I explain one mechanism in plain words.

A story here is a headline, a short excerpt, one image and the link to whoever wrote it. We never reproduce the post; the images belong to their authors. A post written in Japanese appears in Japanese, exactly as it was published, and the link goes to the original.

— Yuki Halvorsen, Tokyo

← Accept All Archive

AI Snake OilVoices

AI existential risk probabilities are (still) too unreliable to inform policy

09.28

Over two years ago we wrote a detailed deconstruction of p(doom) and argued that its primary effect is to launder vague intuitions and fears through a facade of quantification.

Regulation & safety

Read at AI Snake Oil ↗

One letter a week, starting soon.

Latest

AI existential risk probabilities are (still) too unreliable to inform policy

Related

ToolsWatermarking in vLLM vLLM Blog

VoicesHow a single tweet transformed the AI safety debate Understanding AI

VoicesLast Week in AI #344 - Navier–Stokes, Pacing the Frontier, AI Misuse Last Week in AI

ResearchRethinking Robot Safety in the Age of AI IEEE Spectrum Robotics

ResearchDigit 5 May Be the First Humanoid Robot Worker That’s Truly Safe IEEE Spectrum Robotics

VoicesFollowing: The government doesn't want to regulate AI Platformer